T-Cellular expands the Electrical Tower service with two extra antennas – Instances Information On-line

An application from T-Mobile to add two antennas to a Service Electric tower in Salisbury parish was approved.

Antennas on the tower are used for cellphone communication.

The Salisbury Township Zoning Hearing Board unanimously voted 5-0 to approve T-Mobile Northeast, LLC’s call to approve a derogation “to reduce existing non-compliant use by more than 25 percent beyond the life of its non-compliant use by adding two additional antennas to a commercial communications tower on Savercool Ave. 1809 in a nature reserve.

Zoning Hearing Board member Ron Evans moved to put Zoning Hearing Board deputy Tom Spinner to the vote.

Nine attendees were listed on Zoom for the T-Mobile portion of the March 2nd zoning hearing. Zoners met in the assembly room of the city building.

Four antennas would be replaced and two antennas would be added on the approximately 300 foot tower that sits on part of Lehigh Mountain north of East Susquehanna Street and Broadway.

Michael S. Grab, attorney at law, partner of Nikolaus & Hohenadel, LLP, law firm, Columbia, Lancaster County, represented T-Mobile and opened the testimony referring to the 2012 Pennsylvania Assembly’s Wireless Broadband Collocation Act, which he finds The Variance- Appeal is “simply an administrative process”.

Victor F. Cavacini, Attorney at Gross McGinley, LLP, Allentown Law Firm, and attorney for the Township Zoning Hearing Board cited a memo from Attorney John W. Ashley, Davison & McCarthy, Allentown, February 4, 2021. Who is the Attorney the community and “still believed there had to be some zoning relief,” Cavacini said.

“I don’t read the collocation law to mean that all zones are ignored,” said Cavacini.

Grab went on to note that the lattice tower “has multiple antennas.

“There will be some new radios in the closet, but nothing to add to the closet,” said Grab.

The tower is owned by Service Electric Cable TV and Communications.

“The antennas are a bit out of date. We want to update the technology to continue to cover the region, ”said Conor Sheerin, a consultant.

T-Mobile rents space on the antenna tower from Service Electric. Other communication companies rent space for antennas on the tower from Service Electric. There are about 30 antennas on the tower.

Joseph Kovach, a member of the Zoning Hearing Board, asked who was responsible for maintenance. Service Electric is responsible for the tower. T-Mobile is responsible for the equipment.

The existing antennas are 56 cm tall and 8 cm wide.

The new antennas would be 59 inches tall and 9 inches wide.

Attorney Kent Herman, chairman of the Zoning Hearing Board, asked if there would be any significant differences in lighting, noise, or interference with other technologies such as televisions. He was told there wouldn’t be any.

Spinner asked how the antennas would be installed. He was told that a mechanical crane would be used. The installation should take about a week.

“Is there an environmental risk to the neighbors?” Asked Cavacini.

“It’s all radio frequency. In general, emissions are hundreds of values ​​lower, ”said Sheerin.

Cavacini asked whether a wind load analysis had been completed, whether an intermodulation analysis had been carried out, and whether a study on electromagnetic emissions had been carried out. He was told they were all finished.

“Is it emitting electromagnetic radiation?” Asked Cavacini.

“Yes it does,” said Grab.

“Do you even need a variance?” Asked Herman.

“This is a faulty tower,” replied Cavacini.

“Electromagnetic emissions are a problem,” added Cavacini.

“We reached out to Attorney Ashley about improper use,” said Kerry Rabold, Salisbury Township Zoning Officer.

“We can’t use 5G. The antennas with the system are now obsolete, “said Kevin Risner, senior engineer for radio frequency development at T-Mobile, referring to the merger of Sprint with T-Mobile, which was completed in 2018.

“T-Mobile is prohibited from interfering. T-Mobile works within strict bandwidths, ”said Risner.

Kovach inquired about the definition of 5G, the fifth version of the technology for broadband cellular networks, which will be deployed from 2019.

“5G uses a much more sophisticated modulation, 100 to 200 megabytes per second. It requires an additional antenna, ”said Risner.

Jeff Kelly, director of engineering at Service Electric Cable and Communications, said T-Mobile had signed a contract with Service Electric to rent space on the tower since 1997.

Kathleen Nesfeder, whose property is adjacent to the tower property, asked: “What is the difference in radio frequencies? How much additional radio frequency will there be in the area? “

“We comply with all FCC regulations,” said Grab.

“Who is monitoring the radio frequency?” Asked Nesfeder.

“The FCC,” said Risner.

“Did you know California banned 5G towers because they caused cancer?” Asked Nesfeder.

“No. That’s not true,” said Risner.

“We only send a fraction of what we are entitled to,” said Risner.

“I don’t think there is a lot of data on these things. I would say I am neutral. That’s a problem, ”said Nesfeder.

“We have been tested for radiation by the FCC. You have been up there twice. We make sure that we always comply with the regulations. We are within the exposure limits for any type of radiation, ”said Kelly.

“If you choose to give approval, you need to provide evidence of all of these matters,” said Cavacini.

“It won’t change the essential character of the neighborhood,” said Herman.

“It would be appropriate to create conditions under which the applicant submits a report to the zoning officer,” said Herman, noting that approval must be made conditional on a report on the technical requirements.

On another appeal at the March 2nd hearing. The Zoners voted 5-0 in favor of Michael Smith and Jill Lipovsky Smith, 1162 Glick Ave., approving a deviation to build a two-story condominium within the required setback in the front yard (25 feet required, 19.81 feet proposed) and maintain an accessory within the required setback in the back yard (6 feet required, 0.35 feet present). The property is located in the R3 residential area with a medium low density.

For this part of the March 2nd hearing, 11 participants were listed without objection.

Jill Smith showed the map and a photo of a retaining wall at the end of the street.

Glick Avenue is a paper alley defined as a planned street that has never been adopted by a community.

“We’re standing in front of the Autobahn, I-78. The house is sloping. We’re really not going to have a negative impact on the neighbors because there are no neighbors on either side, ”said Jill Smith.

To the north of the property is a water retention basin maintained by South Whitehall Township.

There were no questions from zoners.

Rabold said she recommends adding a variation for an existing shed as well.

The Salisbury Ward Zoning Hearing Board was due to meet at 7:00 p.m. on April 6 at the meetinghouse with the public and media to pre-register through Zoom.

Comments are closed.